<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>My CMS</provider_name><provider_url>https://lifenetwork.eu</provider_url><author_name>lifenetwork</author_name><author_url>https://lifenetwork.eu/author/lifenetwork/</author_url><title>When a subsidiary law breaches a primary law - My CMS</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lifenetwork.eu/subsidiary-law-breaches-primary-law/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;When a subsidiary law breaches a primary law&#x201D; &#x2014; My CMS" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://lifenetwork.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/aquilina_.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>684</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>454</thumbnail_height><description>On 4 October 2017, PN MPs David Agius and Stephen Spiteri, two Nationalist Party MPs, tabled a private members Motion, Motion No. 66, in the House of Representatives. They proposed an amendment to the Leave for Medically Assisted Procreation National Standard Order, 2017 (Legal Notice 156 of 2017). The motion requested that the words &#x2018;prospective [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
