<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>My CMS</provider_name><provider_url>https://lifenetwork.eu</provider_url><author_name>lifenetwork</author_name><author_url>https://lifenetwork.eu/author/lifenetwork/</author_url><title>Undermining embryo protection - My CMS</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lifenetwork.eu/undermining-embryo-protection/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Undermining embryo protection&#x201D; &#x2014; My CMS" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://lifenetwork.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/BabyEmbryo.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>488</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>370</thumbnail_height><description>In the past week, we have seen a series of debates explode in the news regarding the introduction of a supposedly innocuous legal notice (156 of 2017) regarding leave for medically assisted procreation. On close examination of this legal notice, one finds a change in the definition of &#x201C;prospective parents&#x201D; to now be &#x201C;the two [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
